Donor Supporters

Jessie Ong

Alhambra Source provides objective and important news reporting for our community.

Efren Moreno, Former Alhambra Mayor

Thank you Alhambra Source for truly informing the residents of Alhambra.

Jeff Maloney, Alhambra City Council Member

The Source has become an important source for news, public interest, and serious journalism in our community. Keep it up!

Sara Harris

As a career journalist and EJ advocate, I see community-based media like the Alhambra Source as crucial to democracy and equality.

Chris Olson

I support Alhambra Source as often as I can because I believe a free and independent press is vital to the democratic process. No other news outlet with high journalistic standards consistently covers the stories and issues that matter to our community.

Adele Andrade Stadler, Alhambra City Council Member

The Source is a great independent newspaper that celebrates the communities and is not afraid to ask the tough questions!

Cliff Bender, Vice President, Alhambra Education Foundation

I want to know what's going on in my community- News, events, and human interest stories. The Alhambra Source gives me the information I need.

Joyce & Oscar Amaro, Alhambra Preservation Group

We support Alhambra Source because this online news source is vitally important in engaging, informing and educating the residents of Alhambra.

Laura Vasquez

Alhambrans need to know the truth about our area!

Michael Lawrence, Alhambra Arts Commissioner

Keep bringing on the stories. The Source has given us so much and I am happy to donate to such an important part of our community.

Karsen Luthi

Thank you for creating Alhambra Source and providing timely reporting of important local news. Fight on!

Mr. Konnyaku

I support news reporting that is unbiased and informative. Really enjoy the excellent coverage on local city council and planning commission meetings.

Guadulesa Rivera

Alhambra Source unifies the community and keeps us involved.

Erwin Lee

Such a valuable source of what’s happening in city where we live. Objective reporting that informs us and allows us to come to our own conclusions.

The Villages Cannot Meet IHO But Open to Negotiations

Illustrative site plan from The Ratkovich Company's Design Review Board submittal of The Villages at The Alhambra.


Alhambra , CA

The developer of the proposed housing project The Villages at The Alhambra told the city’s Planning Commission this week that meeting the city’s new affordable housing standard would make the project uneconomical although it would help the city meet its target for increasing moderate- and above-moderate-income housing.

At Monday’s Planning Commission meeting, The Ratkovich Company, responding to public criticism, suggested there was some room for negotiation. Megan Moloughney, the project’s senior development manager, said aspects of the project’s design, including the number of units and parking, are negotiable, but “nothing is black and white.”

Hanging over the proposal is Alhambra’s new affordable housing law requiring projects like The Villages to provide 15 percent of its total units to low- and moderate-income households. If a developer does not want to provide the required housing on-site, it has the option to build units elsewhere, pay an in-lieu fee or donate land to the city for future affordable housing.

The Villages at The Alhambra is designed with a total of 1,061 units – 516 for sale at market prices and 545 rentals. As proposed, 55 of the rental units would be designated to moderate-income families.

Moloughney said the project, as currently designed, would not be financially viable if 15 percent of the units were set aside for middle- and low-income households as the new ordinance requires.

Short of a redesign, however, what The Ratkovich Company could do to meet requirements of the city’s new Inclusionary Housing Ordinance when it goes into effect in November with its mandate for rental and sales units for middle- and low-income households was unclear.

Moloughney said that eventually the whole complex of 1,061 units would contribute to meeting a state-mandated goal of constructing 6,808 new housing units by 2029: 2,929 above moderate-income, 1,077 moderate-income, 1,033 low-income and 1,769 very low-income units.

With Moloughney were various engineers and experts who contributed to the evaluation reports addressed residents’ concerns regarding traffic, environmental and pollution issues.

The engineers pointed to specific appendices in the environmental impact report ­– civil engineering, water supply and school impacts were some of the sections highlighted – and discussed the methodology for the traffic report.

Another issue that arose in the meeting was the coordinated effort in public comments to discredit Planning Commission member Suzi Dunkel-Soto and City Council member Ross Maza, saying conflicts of interest existed because they are real estate brokers and therefore would benefit from recommending the approval of the project.

Dunkel-Soto read a statement in defense of her credibility and service to Alhambra, and Assistant City Attorney Greg Murphy, backed by confirmation with City Attorney Joe Montes, said he would have “pulled her off, literally now at this point, months ago” if there was a conflict of interest.

He argued that if commission members with certain professions could not weigh in because of a possible future engagement with a project site, any commissioner with ties to real estate, construction or restaurants would be in that category.

The Planning Commission will continue its discussion of The Villages project at its next regularly scheduled meeting Oct. 18. The commission has two regularly scheduled meetings before the affordable housing ordinance comes into effect in the second week of November. The commission does, however, have the option to set special meetings for additional deliberations.

The Alhambra Source encourages comment on our stories. However, we do not vet comments for accuracy or endorse links to posts in the comment section. The thoughts and opinions expressed belong solely to the author of the comment.

Leave a Reply

1 thought on “The Villages Cannot Meet IHO But Open to Negotiations”

  1. Melissa Michelson

    Numerous members of the public have pointed out to the Planning Commission that Dunkel-Soto’s participation in deliberations and vote would violate the City’s own Code of Ethics, in particular #9: Alhambra Code of Ethics (Resolution No. R2M2-45).pdf
    Read it right here https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9lTDiYbNgQrSWFrWnFOQkwwbUE/view
    “#9) Avoid even the appearance of conflict between public duties and personal interests and activities. If elected or appointed officials have personal or financial interests in matters coming before them, they shall disqualify themselves from making, participating in the making of, or seeking to influence any decision respecting such matter.”

    This has absolutely nothing to do with ‘credibility’ or the ‘law’, as was brought up by her and the city’s legal counsel as a straw man argument and perpetuated in this article. She and Maza should recuse themselves to avoid the perception of conflict of interest and to avoid VIOLATING THE CITY’S OWN CODE OF ETHICS.