Support Alhambra Source

Make A Donation

Marengo Avenue development brings up a variety of issues

  • Trees on the Camellia Court project site in 2017. Photo by Phoenix Tso.

  • Photo by Phoenix Tso.

  • Photo by Phoenix Tso.


Alhambra , CA United States

The recent approval of a large mixed-use development on Valley Boulevard and Marengo Avenue focused attention on environmental issues in the City of Alhambra, as the fate of almost 300 trees on the site were called into question.

Plans showed that while the Sunny View Care Center nursing home would be rebuilt, the fate of a church that community members say has historic value was also up in the air. An expected zoning change following the project’s approval recalled recent battles between residents and city officials over responsible development ahead of a long-awaited updating of the city’s general plan, which governs urban planning in Alhambra.

The City Council last week initially approved the zoning change and general plan amendment to allow a portion of the land, much of it in a residential neighborhood, to be developed commercially as part of the city’s Valley Boulevard Specific Plan. The developer, working on behalf of a group of local physicians, planned to build condominiums, a retail space and medical facilities.

Photo by Phoenix Tso.

Alhambra resident Lola Armendariz expressed concern at the City Council meeting about what would happen to the tree canopy at the Sunny View campus, and brought up a Los Angeles Times article that mentioned Alhambra as one of the hardest hit areas by tree-targeting insects and disease.

She asked the city to share a tree survey that the developer, St. Clair Company, had to submit. This survey would allow the city to determine which trees could remain undisturbed or be incorporated into the new development.

There are 268 trees on site of a dizzying variety, including jacarandas, oaks, coast redwoods, eucalyptuses and several types of fruit-bearing trees, consulting arborist Richard Ibarra wrote in a letter to St. Clair. He recommended that some of the site’s Crape Myrtle trees be incorporated into the new project.

According to a map based on the survey, the city planned on incorporating around 40 existing trees in the new project, and saving many of the trees that dot the site’s perimeter.

The Chapel of St. Simon and Jude, built in 1926. Photo courtesy of Susan Hixon, Episcopal Communities & Services.

Residents at the City Council vote also asked whether the new development means the destruction of a historic building, the Chapel of St. Simon and Jude. The church was left from the time when the nursing home was owned by Episcopal Communities & Services. According to the 1985 Alhambra Historical and Cultural Resources Survey, it was built in 1926 and was designed by Reginald D. Johnson, a prominent Pasadena-area architect at the time. The survey listed the church as a building to be studied for possible historic preservation.

Another building, Johnson Hall, was built on the property in 1923, housing 23 senior residents.

But a required environmental study submitted about the site concluded, “Although many historical structures have been identified within the city, no archaeological resources are known to exist.” Representatives from the St. Clair Company did not return the Alhambra Source’s request for comment on whether they were aware of this history.

Part of the Sunny View Care Center campus will become part of the Valley Boulevard Specific Plan. Courtesy of City of Alhambra Development Services.

At the City Council vote, a couple of residents raised questions about why the development necessitated a zoning change and an amendment to the city’s general plan. Cliff Bender asked what such a change said about the future of responsible development in Alhambra. “This new thoroughly developed plan shouldn’t need zoning changes/amendments, at least not so many of them,” he said.

In response, several City Council members called the change a “small amendment” that brings the whole project in line with the current general plan. City officials also said that the Valley Boulevard Specific Plan, which allows for more density and commercial development, would not change when the new general plan comes out and that the project would also align with that document. The City Council was likely to give the zone change their final approval on Monday.

Independent journalism is a bedrock of democracy--and it's in crisis. Here at the Alhambra Source, we're committed to covering the local stories that matter most to you. We don’t have advertisers and we don’t have pay walls, but we do have bills. You read to the end of this story. That's great. But this kind of journalism will end without public support. Join us! Support the work and the democratic values it serves. Donate now!

The Alhambra Source encourages comment on our stories. However, we do not vet comments for accuracy or endorse links to posts in the comment section. The thoughts and opinions expressed belong solely to the author of the comment.

Leave a Reply

1 thought on “Marengo Avenue development brings up a variety of issues”

  1. Melissa Michelson

    Of the 268 trees in the property + the 26 outside on city property (which are staying anyway because it’s on city land) only 3 trees, in all the 11 acres are to stay untouched. (#s 266 , 267, 268) – that’s 1% of all the trees! About 40 of the 268 trees will be transplanted, and 90% of those are myrtle. This is according to the developer’s arborist’s coversheet map. An independent arborist has said the majority of the trees are healthy and in good condition, some like the Magnolias need water because all of a sudden the owners have stopped watering them.