fbpx

Support Alhambra Source!

Double your donation!

Donor Supporters

Elba Alonso de Ortega

I’m a lifelong resident of Alhambra and having a local newspaper, like Alhambra Source, is very important to me. It’s the only way to know the issues that will directly affect my day to day, where I live. That’s why I decided to support Alhambra Source with a monthly donation.

Efren Moreno, Former Alhambra Mayor

Thank you Alhambra Source for truly informing the residents of Alhambra.

Jeff Maloney, Alhambra City Council Member

The Source has become an important source for news, public interest, and serious journalism in our community. Keep it up!

Chris Olson

I support Alhambra Source as often as I can because I believe a free and independent press is vital to the democratic process. No other news outlet with high journalistic standards consistently covers the stories and issues that matter to our community.

Adele Andrade Stadler, Alhambra Mayor

The Source is a great independent newspaper that celebrates the communities and is not afraid to ask the tough questions!

Cliff Bender, Vice President, Alhambra Education Foundation

Alhambra Source is the ONLY independent news source covering the events, culture and government of our city. We need it to stay informed and aware!

Joyce & Oscar Amaro, Alhambra Preservation Group

We support Alhambra Source because this online news source is vitally important in engaging, informing and educating the residents of Alhambra.

Jose Aguayo

I support the Alhambra Source because journalism will always be part of that fourth branch of our democracy. The Alhambra Source provides me with news that helps me make informed decisions about issues that matter to me and my community. Thank you for the work you do.

Michael Lawrence, Alhambra Arts Commissioner

Keep bringing on the stories. The Source has given us so much and I am happy to donate to such an important part of our community.

Karsen Luthi

Thank you for creating Alhambra Source and providing timely reporting of important local news. Fight on!

Shirley Tatsuno

I support Alhambra Source for their detailed information about important Alhambra issues and compelling human-interest stories.

Tammie Leung

I support local news - it’s important to know what is happening in our communities.

Los Angeles Metro votes to implement alternatives to the 710 tunnel

Photo by Ken Lund licensed under CC BY-SA 2.0.

Location

Alhambra , CA United States

Los Angeles Metro’s Board of Directors voted unanimously on Thursday to endorse a traffic management solution to alleviate congestion from an unfinished 710 freeway. Officially known as the Transportation System Management/Transportation Demand Management alternative, this solution would be implemented instead of a controversial 710 tunnel.

The motion that the board adopted would take $105 million of $780 million allocated to close the 710 gap and use that money to implement this alternative, which could include traffic light synchronization and street widening, a Metro press release said. This $780 million was raised by a half-cent sales tax increase that took effect in 2009, known as Measure R.

The LA Metro press release said that the remainder of the $780 million would go to other “mobility improvement projects” in Alhambra and other San Gabriel Valley cities. The 710 freeway currently ends in Alhambra, and has caused major traffic congestion there.

One of the proposed solutions has been constructing a 4.5-mile tunnel to connect the 710 with the 10 and 210 freeways in the San Gabriel Valley, a solution that Metro issued a detailed report on in 2015. Alhambra supported the tunnel, while neighboring cities like Pasadena and South Pasadena opposed it.

While the final decision over whether the tunnel project moves forward lies with Caltrans, Metro’s endorsement of the Transportation System Management/Transportation Demand Management alternative takes key funding away from the tunnel.

Kim Upton, a spokesperson for LA Metro, said that the board recognized that “the tunnel is not fundable for many, many years.” The transportation system management alternative was a much more palatable option. “There’s a lot of money to do some good, and that’s what the goal of this measure is,” Upton said.

Alhambra Mayor David Mejia said that while the tunnel would still be the best option to relieve traffic, he hoped that the majority of Measure R funds would get allocated to Alhambra and its neighbors. “I hope that Alhambra gets a little more than everybody else, because we’re at the epicenter,” he said, adding that the city council would soon make a list of traffic relief projects to get funding for.

Independent journalism is a bedrock of democracy--and it's in crisis. Here at the Alhambra Source, we're committed to covering the local stories that matter most to you. We don’t have advertisers and we don’t have pay walls, but we do have bills. You read to the end of this story. That's great. But this kind of journalism will end without public support. Join us! Support the work and the democratic values it serves. Donate now!

The Alhambra Source encourages comment on our stories. However, we do not vet comments for accuracy or endorse links to posts in the comment section. The thoughts and opinions expressed belong solely to the author of the comment.

Leave a Reply

2 thoughts on “Los Angeles Metro votes to implement alternatives to the 710 tunnel”

  1. I found it amusing that despite voting against the tunnel, the email I received from Metro said its staff (most likely spoon-fed by the consultants) still think a tunnel the best option available. Specifically, it said “the alternative that best addresses the purpose and need of the project and the performance measures set to evaluate all alternatives considered in the environmental process is the Single Bore Freeway Tunnel (SBFT) with tolls and truck restrictions.”
    After all this time, it is clear there isn’t sufficient political will or money to build the tunnel on the local level. The $7-11 billion it would have taken to build a vehicle tunnel will now be used to fund light rail or subway projects. For comparison, the Blue Line light rail cost about $85 million per mile (in 2012 dollars) and the Purple line subway is expected to cost about $450-500 million/mile. My guess is the money goes to build a light rail connector from Pasadena to the NoHo Red Line station, and perhaps Burbank Airport.

  2. The Measure M sales tax doesn’t go to any of this! So we’re paying the tax and getting no benefit. Disappointing.