Donor Supporters

Jessie Ong

Alhambra Source provides objective and important news reporting for our community.

Efren Moreno, Former Alhambra Mayor

Thank you Alhambra Source for truly informing the residents of Alhambra.

Jeff Maloney, Alhambra City Council Member

The Source has become an important source for news, public interest, and serious journalism in our community. Keep it up!

Sara Harris

As a career journalist and EJ advocate, I see community-based media like the Alhambra Source as crucial to democracy and equality.

Chris Olson

I support Alhambra Source as often as I can because I believe a free and independent press is vital to the democratic process. No other news outlet with high journalistic standards consistently covers the stories and issues that matter to our community.

Adele Andrade Stadler, Alhambra City Council Member

The Source is a great independent newspaper that celebrates the communities and is not afraid to ask the tough questions!

Cliff Bender, Vice President, Alhambra Education Foundation

I want to know what's going on in my community- News, events, and human interest stories. The Alhambra Source gives me the information I need.

Joyce & Oscar Amaro, Alhambra Preservation Group

We support Alhambra Source because this online news source is vitally important in engaging, informing and educating the residents of Alhambra.

Laura Vasquez

Alhambrans need to know the truth about our area!

Michael Lawrence, Alhambra Arts Commissioner

Keep bringing on the stories. The Source has given us so much and I am happy to donate to such an important part of our community.

Karsen Luthi

Thank you for creating Alhambra Source and providing timely reporting of important local news. Fight on!

Mr. Konnyaku

I support news reporting that is unbiased and informative. Really enjoy the excellent coverage on local city council and planning commission meetings.

Guadulesa Rivera

Alhambra Source unifies the community and keeps us involved.

Erwin Lee

Such a valuable source of what’s happening in city where we live. Objective reporting that informs us and allows us to come to our own conclusions.

Development at Marguerita and Curtis Avenues Is Approved with SB 330

East, west, north and south-facing views of the proposed development at Curtis and Marguerita avenues. Image via SLS Design; included in July 16 and Aug. 4 planning commission agendas.


Alhambra , CA

Alhambra’s Planning Commission approved the hotly contested development project proposed between Marguerita Avenue and Curtis Avenue at Monday’s meeting. In a twist ending, city staff found the project would need to comply with the latest California tenant protections – the major obstacle in the project’s approval.

The agenda laid out staff’s recommendation that the commission approve the project. The point of concern for most of the commission and the majority of public comment was the likely displacement of the current tenants on the property.

Alhambra’s planning staff had initially concluded that the property owners were not required by law to observe California’s Senate Bill 330, the Housing Crisis Act, because the application was completed before Jan. 1, when more stringent tenant protections came into force.

The planning staff had determined that the application was complete Sept. 22 last year because the city had failed to respond within 30 days of the Aug. 23 submission. Confusion arose from a July 16 staff report, saying the application was “deemed complete” on April 30. But Paul Lam, the city’s principal planner, said this was a poor word choice and meant the project was ready for the planning commission’s consideration.

Responding later to public comment, architect Vincent Tsoi said a possible reason for confusion was that the developers found that a payment due in November had been overlooked and paid only in February, even though materials had been submitted in November to the city.

A couple commissioners then asked the staff and city attorney if this new information – the incomplete payment – affected the timeline for completion. After a discussion between Lam and city lawyer Greg Murphy, Murphy determined the new knowledge of payment in February indeed meant the application process was not complete until February 2020.

Before SB 330 with its stronger tenant protections applied to the project, the developers said the landowners were willing to give current tenants three times their current rent payment, their deposit and moving costs.

Now Speedee USA, the name of the group on the application, must provide options to low- or very low-income tenants within a five-year period preceding the application.  These include replacement of affordable units and right to refuse the unit, or relocation assistance.

The final vote approving the Marguerita/Curtis development was 6-1-1, with Ron Sahu voting no and Noya Wang, a new commission member, abstaining. President Allan Sanchez and commissioner Scott Chan recused themselves because their residences are close to the location.

At the July 16 commission meeting, city staff bundled public comment. Monday, each of those comments was read aloud as well as newly received comments. Of the 57 emailed comments and four speakers, only one public comment was in favor of the project. The bulk of comments in opposition were almost identical in the same language.

The next planning commission is scheduled for Aug. 17, when the affordable housing ordinance and The Villages development are back on the agenda.

This article has been updated on Aug. 5 to reflect the commissioners’ recusals.

The Alhambra Source encourages comment on our stories. However, we do not vet comments for accuracy or endorse links to posts in the comment section. The thoughts and opinions expressed belong solely to the author of the comment.

Leave a Reply

3 thoughts on “Development at Marguerita and Curtis Avenues Is Approved with SB 330”

  1. Melissa Michelson

    Thank you for providing the response from the public. It’s still unfathomable to me that City of Alhambra continually ignores the public and does what it wants, always in favor of developers. For The Villages, Suzi-Dunkel Soto should RECUSE herself because she stands to PROFIT from the development.

  2. Michael Lawrence

    Thank you Alhambra Source and Ms Arase for covering the most recent hearings by both council and planning commission. With the Villages, campaign finance reform ballot initiative, Inclusionary Housing Ordinance and elections all on the near horizon, it is more important than ever that we stay informed.

  3. Alhambra continue to ignore its residents. VOTE OUT all of those who approved this project.