Donor Supporters

Jessie Ong

Alhambra Source provides objective and important news reporting for our community.

Efren Moreno, Former Alhambra Mayor

Thank you Alhambra Source for truly informing the residents of Alhambra.

Jeff Maloney, Alhambra City Council Member

The Source has become an important source for news, public interest, and serious journalism in our community. Keep it up!

Sara Harris

As a career journalist and EJ advocate, I see community-based media like the Alhambra Source as crucial to democracy and equality.

Chris Olson

I support Alhambra Source as often as I can because I believe a free and independent press is vital to the democratic process. No other news outlet with high journalistic standards consistently covers the stories and issues that matter to our community.

Adele Andrade Stadler, Alhambra City Council Member

The Source is a great independent newspaper that celebrates the communities and is not afraid to ask the tough questions!

Cliff Bender, Vice President, Alhambra Education Foundation

I want to know what's going on in my community- News, events, and human interest stories. The Alhambra Source gives me the information I need.

Joyce & Oscar Amaro, Alhambra Preservation Group

We support Alhambra Source because this online news source is vitally important in engaging, informing and educating the residents of Alhambra.

Laura Vasquez

Alhambrans need to know the truth about our area!

Michael Lawrence, Alhambra Arts Commissioner

Keep bringing on the stories. The Source has given us so much and I am happy to donate to such an important part of our community.

Karsen Luthi

Thank you for creating Alhambra Source and providing timely reporting of important local news. Fight on!

Mr. Konnyaku

I support news reporting that is unbiased and informative. Really enjoy the excellent coverage on local city council and planning commission meetings.

Guadulesa Rivera

Alhambra Source unifies the community and keeps us involved.

Erwin Lee

Such a valuable source of what’s happening in city where we live. Objective reporting that informs us and allows us to come to our own conclusions.

Expansion of 710 Freeway debated at Alhambra Library

Residents of cities from around the San Gabriel Valley congregated at the Alhambra Civic Library on Wednesday evening for a Metro-run conversation intended to get the public involved in solutions for the 710 gap. In 2008 voters voted overwhelmingly for a measure that would commit a projected $40 billion to traffic relief and transportation upgrades throughout the county over the next 30 years.

The meeting was the first in a series that aim, “to get the community into the conversation and to find solutions by looking at the historic and futuristic role of transportation,” Metro Communications Manager Helen Ortiz Gilstrap said.

Initially, as part of focus groups, residents shared what they appreciate about their cities: walking areas, diversity, family neighborhoods, schools, restaurants, and the proximity to downtown.

What residents at library meeting liked about their communities | facebook.com/sr710conversationsBut when it came to concerns about transportation, the discussion started to sound more like a debate. Residents argued about a proposed tunnel to connect the 710 and 210 freeways. Some had come armed with reports and studies that validated their own arguments for or against closing the 710 gap.

Residents' concerns about their communities | facebook.com/sr710conversations

Several Alhambra residents complained that the congestion around Valley Boulevard and Fremont Avenue is clogging up surface streets and that an extension of the 710 would alleviate some of that traffic. Presenting a different alternative, James Rojas, a long-time Alhambra resident and former Metro employee, proposed expanding light-rail corridors and regional bike paths as a way to get cars off the road. Another Alhambra resident argued he’d much rather ride in his car than use public transportation. And in response to the proposed tunnel, Jan Soohoo of La Canada said that “our transportation officials aren’t listening and they’re not looking forward. They have tunnel vision.” Other concerns ranged from the health impacts of creating a 710 extension, the expense involved and the need for more public transportation in a city where freeways are the prominent mode of transportation.

The meeting was the first in a series of Metro SR-710 Conversations, “Where have we been? Where are we going?” that over the next six weeks aim to get resident input in to how to alleviate transit problems around the 710. More information on meeting discussions and future events will be available at www.metro.net/sr710conversations.

The Alhambra Source encourages comment on our stories. However, we do not vet comments for accuracy or endorse links to posts in the comment section. The thoughts and opinions expressed belong solely to the author of the comment.

Leave a Reply

4 thoughts on “Expansion of 710 Freeway debated at Alhambra Library”

  1. Luis, Metro/Caltrans have told us that the alternatives will be decided during the scoping process. What we do know is that they will consider 1) a tunnel, as budgeted in Measure R; 2) a surface route based on the long-planned right of way and for which Caltrans owns most properties; and 3) no project.

    Join us Wednesday (tomorrow) at the Alhambra Library for the scoping meeting.

    Wednesday, March 16, 6-8pm
    Alhambra Civic Center Library – Reese Hall
    101 S First St
    Alhambra, CA 91801

    In addition to attending the Alhambra meeting, there are several other meetings with the same topic that are listed on the 710 schedule. There are meetings scheduled in South Pas, Pasadena, El Sereno, Glendale, and Alhambra. And you can do what I did for the first meeting, attend online.

  2. Just what are the alternates for an extention for the 710 frwy or a byway through Alhambra 710? Is there any line of sight aheads the solutions an a? What is antciptely an answer, solution ultimaated and by whom?… concerned citizen… Luis.. A temporily devised solution is not an answer. We need resoltion now. What?…Luis

  3. A temporary solution would construct a two-lane each direction limited access (only additional access at Alhambra Avenue) throughway starting from Huntington Drive extending southerly to Valley Blvd. including no stopping or parking with a bikeway through the Cal-Trans right-of-way, removing the existing (blighted)houses. Include upgrades to the intersection of Huntington Drive and Fremont Avenue, with no tunnel at this time.

  4. In a 100yrs it still aint going to matter!!!move on yes no maybe so,30yrs and still fighting over this fwy,