Donor Supporters

Jessie Ong

Alhambra Source provides objective and important news reporting for our community.

Efren Moreno, Former Alhambra Mayor

Thank you Alhambra Source for truly informing the residents of Alhambra.

Jeff Maloney, Alhambra City Council Member

The Source has become an important source for news, public interest, and serious journalism in our community. Keep it up!

Sara Harris

As a career journalist and EJ advocate, I see community-based media like the Alhambra Source as crucial to democracy and equality.

Chris Olson

I support Alhambra Source as often as I can because I believe a free and independent press is vital to the democratic process. No other news outlet with high journalistic standards consistently covers the stories and issues that matter to our community.

Adele Andrade Stadler, Alhambra City Council Member

The Source is a great independent newspaper that celebrates the communities and is not afraid to ask the tough questions!

Cliff Bender, Vice President, Alhambra Education Foundation

I want to know what's going on in my community- News, events, and human interest stories. The Alhambra Source gives me the information I need.

Joyce & Oscar Amaro, Alhambra Preservation Group

We support Alhambra Source because this online news source is vitally important in engaging, informing and educating the residents of Alhambra.

Laura Vasquez

Alhambrans need to know the truth about our area!

Michael Lawrence, Alhambra Arts Commissioner

Keep bringing on the stories. The Source has given us so much and I am happy to donate to such an important part of our community.

Karsen Luthi

Thank you for creating Alhambra Source and providing timely reporting of important local news. Fight on!

Mr. Konnyaku

I support news reporting that is unbiased and informative. Really enjoy the excellent coverage on local city council and planning commission meetings.

Guadulesa Rivera

Alhambra Source unifies the community and keeps us involved.

Erwin Lee

Such a valuable source of what’s happening in city where we live. Objective reporting that informs us and allows us to come to our own conclusions.

Council postpones decision on Midwick Tract after residents receive late notice about hearing

City Council postponed on Monday a vote on an ordinance that would rezone a part of the Midwick Tract, shelving it for the next regular meeting on the 23rd. The ordinance affects 8.8 acres of land at 2400 South Fremont, which is currently designated as R-1 (single family residences) and R-2 (multiple family residences). If approved the ordinance would rezone the area according to the proposed Specific Plan, which would allow for a 70-unit residential development. 
The postponement came in response to a mailing mixup that, according the Director of Administrative Services Chris Paulson, happened within the United States Postal Office. Per Alhambra city code, the city was required to notify all households within 300 feet of the development site about the public hearing. The city was also required to send out the notices 10 days in advance of the hearing. Paulson said that the city handed the notices to the Bay State Street United States Post Office on Jan. 30, meeting the 10 days requirement.
The following week, Paulson received several complaints from residents who said they hadn't received the notices until Feb. 5 or Feb 6. Paulson also noted that, recently, former council members had told him that they hadn't received the council meeting agendas in their mailboxes.
The city investigated this by speaking with service representatives at the post office. According to Paulson, he was informed that no mail is delivered to Alhambra residents directly from the Alhambra post office. Instead, all mail is sent to the City of Industry for processing, with letter-sized items also going to Santa Ana. 
Paulson was told that the extra processing time for letter-sized items may account for the recent delays. "Based on my conversations with the post-office staff and the information gathered. And the fact that the letters were postmark January 30. It appears that the delays had to have come from the United States Postal Office," said Paulson. 
While the Council decided to move their decision to the 23rd, and while a presentation from City Ventures, the developers interested in the 2400 South Fremont area, was withheld, residents at the meeting were allowed to speak on the Midwick development. 
Some residents returned to the mailing issue, saying that the city could do more with outreach. 
Alhambra resident Jack Shiung said he had to learn about public hearings through his neighbors. "Of all the meetings I've gone to, I have maybe received one notice," said Shiung. 
Resident Thomas Fernandez said he was confused about why he hadn't received a notice about the Midwick hearing, when he had gotten a notice about the Marriott hotel project in Monterey Park. "I don't know why we don't get notices about things in this neighborhood, when you send us literature about projects in Monterey Park," said Fernandez.
Per ordinance procedures, the ordinance will have to be approved at two public hearings before it will be enacted.

The Alhambra Source encourages comment on our stories. However, we do not vet comments for accuracy or endorse links to posts in the comment section. The thoughts and opinions expressed belong solely to the author of the comment.

Leave a Reply

4 thoughts on “Council postpones decision on Midwick Tract after residents receive late notice about hearing”

  1. I’m happy Gretchen, and it’s obvious you’re the one who’s not…

  2. Hmm. Mr Paulson is the son of a former mayor/councilman who was involved in supporting wealthy developers to destroy old Alhambra historical buildings in order to bring in more high-dense developers, and he (the father) is a real estate agent making big bucks from developers interests. Something smells FISHY here.It seems latest there have been “too many mistakes” by the city council, but these so-called “mistakes” are sometimes found out by a group of Alhambra residents who are tired of the secretive ways the city council constantly cave in to developers interest instead of supporting residents who want to slow down this run-a-way “train wreck” (of developers). But we get what we deserve by failing to vote out incumbents who pretend to “back us” but continue changing planning zones to appease their largest campaign campaign contributors – DEVELOPERS.

    1. As I recall, Mr. Paulson also is a former City Councilmember and mayor. My son grew up with both Paulson boys, attended the same elementary school (Fremont) and was in the same Boy Scout troop. One would have expected better things from them.

  3. Who are they kidding that City Council was elected with money from all the developers wanting to ruin our city with too much traffic and ugly buildings. This is decision was made alone time ago. I hope all the people that had the chance to clean up the City County in the last 2 elections are happy.